A literature review of lesson study in initial teacher education: Perspectives about learning and observation

Author(s): Deborah Lynn Sorton Larssen, (Department of Teacher Education, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway) Wasyl Cajkler, (School of Education, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK Reidar Mosvold, (Department of Teacher Education, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway) Raymond Bjuland, (Department of Teacher Education, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway) Nina Helgevold, (Department of Teacher Education, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway) Janne Fauskanger, (Department of Teacher Education, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway) Phil Wood, (School of Education, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK) Fay Baldry, (School of Education, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK) Arne Jakobsen, (Department of Teacher Education, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway) Hans Erik Bugge, (Department of Teacher Education, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway) Gro Næsheim-Bjørkvik, (Department of Teacher Education, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway) Julie Norton, (School of English, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK)
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to conduct a structured review of literature on lesson study (LS) in initial teacher education (ITE). The focus was on how learning and observation were discussed in studies of LS in ITE.
Design/methodology/approach
Each national team (in Norway and Britain) undertook independent searches of published peer-reviewed articles. The resulting articles were then combined, screened and collaboratively reviewed, the focus being on two areas of enquiry: how learning is represented and discussed; and the extent to which observation is described and used to capture evidence of learning.
Findings
The literature review indicated that there was no universally held understanding of, or explanation for, the process of observation, how it should be conducted, and who or what should be the principal focus of attention. There was also a lack of clarity in the definition of learning and the use of learning theory to support these observations.
Research limitations/implications
This study was limited to a review of a selection of peer-reviewed journal articles, published in English. It arrives at some tentative conclusions, but its scope could have been broadened to include more articles and other types of published material, e.g. theses and book chapters.
Practical implications
Research that investigates the use of LS in ITE needs to be more explicit about how learning is defined and observed. Furthermore, LS research papers need to assure greater clarity and transparency about how observations are conducted in their studies.
Originality/value
This literature review suggests that discussion of both learning and observation in ITE LS research papers should be strengthened. The review highlights three principal challenges that ITE LS researchers should consider: how to prepare student-teachers to observe (professional noticing being a promising option), the wide variation in the focus of classroom observation in ITE lesson studies, and discussion of what is understood by learning needs to stand at the heart of preparation for lesson studies in ITE. Keywords: ObservationLearningLesson studyInitial teacher education Type: Literature review Publisher: Emerald Publishing Limited Received: 20 June 2017 Revised: 20 September 2017, 13 October 2017 Accepted: 14 October 2017 Acknowledgments: The authors are very grateful for the comments and helpful suggestions given by anonymous reviewers. Copyright:© Emerald Publishing Limited 2018 Published by Emerald Publishing Limited Licensed re-use rights only Citation:Deborah Lynn Sorton LarssenWasyl CajklerReidar MosvoldRaymond BjulandNina HelgevoldJanne FauskangerPhil WoodFay BaldryArne JakobsenHans Erik BuggeGro Næsheim-BjørkvikJulie Norton, (2018) “A literature review of lesson study in initial teacher education: Perspectives about learning and observation”, International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, Vol. 7 Issue: 1, pp.8-22, https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-06-2017-0030 Downloads: The fulltext of this document has been downloaded 141 times since 2018
Translate »